Definition of condition: Shoulder impingement syndrome is defined as a painful entrapment of the supraspinatus tendon, subacromial-subdeltoid bursa, and/or the biceps tendon between the humeral head and the coracoacromial arch.
Issue statement: Diagnosing a shoulder problem may be difficult because of the number of potential shoulder injuries and the similarity between them. When determining the cause of shoulder impingement syndrome the interaction of a wide range of risk factors must be considered. It is known that a large percentage of rotator cuff lesions are the end result of impingement which can be caused by a combination of hypovascularity, anatomical variations, degeneration as well as mechanical factors and macrotrauma. The trauma reported by the worker often serves to accelerate the disease process or simply results in symptomatic presentation of the ongoing degenerative process.
A potential work relationship may exist if one or more of the following causes of impingement are experienced by the worker as a result of work duties:
Non-work related factors that are associated with impingement include:
Note: Refer to Table I for a summary of Shoulder Impingement Syndrome including its stages, etiology, diagnosis, management, clinical course and differential diagnosis.
Differential Diagnosis: Other conditions that can exhibit some of the findings of impingement syndrome include:
|
cervical radiculopathy |
acromioclavicular joint degeneration |
|
glenohumeral arthritis |
brachial plexus neuropathy |
|
calcific deposits |
neoplasm |
|
adhesive capsulitis |
glenohumeral instability (refer to Glenohumeral Instability Guideline) |
Impingement remains a clinical diagnosis despite advanced imaging capabilities. A thorough history, physical examination and specific plain radiographs distinguish between the various causes of shoulder pain and guide appropriate treatment.
Changes that occur with rotator cuff impingement are typically categorized into three progressive stages:
The worker may report pain that:
Physical findings include:
The worker may report:
Physical findings may include all those mentioned in Stage I plus:
The worker may report:
Physical findings may include all those in Stage II plus:
Pain-related weakness can be present at any stage but injection of local anesthetic within the subacromial space in Stage III will not eliminate weakness and limitation of active motion.
None
Local Anaesthetic Test - Subacromial injection of short acting anaesthetic (xylocaine/marcaine) may be helpful in determining if impingement syndrome is present by temporarily alleviating pain when the impingement positions are retested post injection.
Routine radiography
X-rays are not diagnostic of impingement but possible causes of impingement may be seen i.e., bony changes such as Type II or III acromion. With Stage I impingement, x-rays are often normal. However, evidence of instability such as Hill-Sachs or Bankhart lesions should be sought, as should Stage II or III changes such as:
Plain radiographs are indicated when there is persistent shoulder pain for 6 weeks. Relevant views for impingement syndrome include:
Arthrography can be used to diagnose full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Indications for arthrography include:
Arthroscopy permits direct viewing of the rotator cuff, labrum, capsule, and subacromial space. However, arthroscopy is not considered to be a primary diagnostic tool for determining tears.
MRI is not used to diagnose early stages of rotator cuff disease. MRI usually allows detection of:
MRI may be indicated:
MRI arthrography has been shown to be more accurate than conventional MRI for evaluation of partial-thickness tears.
Ultrasound has been used to identify rotator cuff tears but is technically difficult to perform and sensitivity is low.
Electrophysiologic tests may be indicated to exclude neurogenic causes of pain, weakness and wasting.
Worker education is an important part of rehabilitation and prevention of re-injury and should include the following:
For all stages of impingement, physical therapy is aimed at a gradual activity progression by:
Rotator cuff tears can be asymptomatic. Therefore, when tears are found during investigation for undiagnosed shoulder pain, they may not necessarily be the cause of the shoulder symptomatology. Imaging results should be carefully correlated with the spectrum of clinical findings to ensure appropriate management.
It is crucial to determine the cause of impingement. If impingement is caused by glenohumeral instability, classic impingement management i.e., NSAIDs, subacromial injections and potentially an acromioplasty, will result in treatment failure.
Medications
Long term anti-inflammatory use is not recommended. It is unlikely to have further effect after one month and may cause GI complications.
Conservative management is similar to Stage I. With workers whose symptoms do not improve or who have repeated flare-ups, subacromial decompression or permanent activity modification may be necessary.
Management is much the same as in Stage II but the need for surgical decompression and possible repair of the rotator cuff is more likely. Stage III impingement is treated conservatively for a 6-12 month period and then if necessary surgical treatment is considered.
Immediate referral to an orthopaedic surgeon is indicated for rotator cuff tears with significant compromise of function.
Discretionary referral to an orthopaedic surgeon is indicated for Stage II impingement following failure of conservative treatments.
After an adequate period of conservative management (6-12 months), surgery is indicated for workers with impingement without a tear and with significant functional impairment at the time of presentation.
Earlier surgery may be considered if:
Best results are obtained if a large tear is repaired 2 - 3 weeks after it occurs.
Decompression is inappropriate when instability is the primary cause of the impingement syndrome.
Anterior acromioplasty is not performed for simple impingement problems in workers younger than 40 unless overhang and prominence of the undersurface of the anterior acromion are noted.
Length of disability is influenced by numerous factors such as:
The worker should be relatively free of symptoms in impingement positions before resuming regular work duties.
Work restrictions may be permanent if the job requires sustained, frequent overhead arm positions.
Impairment assessment is primarily based on loss of ROM. An extra judgment award may be assessed if this does not address the full extent of impairment.
Table 1
An overview of Shoulder Impingement Syndrome
|
Impinge ment |
Common |
Main |
Diag- |
Manage- |
Clinical |
Differ- |
|
Stage I |
< 25 |
*Over- *Repe- *Joint |
*Clinical *Impinge- |
*Activity |
reversible |
sublux- |
|
Stage II |
25 - 40 |
*Overuse |
*Clinical |
*Restrict *Treat as *Early *Decom- |
recurrent pain with activity |
adhesive capsulitis
calcium deposits |
|
Stage III |
40+ |
*Occupa- *Falls *Sudden *Atrophic *Occasion- |
*Clinical *Impinge- *External *X-ray plain films *May be *Consider |
*As above *Greater *May need |
progres- |
cervical radiculitis
neoplasm |
[Adapted from Neer, C.S. (1983). Impingement Lesions. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 173, 70-7 and Reid, D.C. (1992). Sports Injury Assessment and Rehabilitation, p.936. New York: Churchill Livingston]